We use cookies to ensure our site functions properly and to store limited information about your usage. You may give or withdraw consent at any time. To find out more, read our privacy policy and cookie policy.
Manage Cookies
A cookie is information stored on your computer by a website you visit. Cookies often store your settings for a website, such as your preferred language or location. This allows the site to present you with information customized to fit your needs. As per the GDPR law, companies need to get your explicit approval to collect your data. Some of these cookies are ‘strictly necessary’ to provide the basic functions of the website and can not be turned off, while others if present, have the option of being turned off. Learn more about our Privacy and Cookie policies. These can be managed also from our cookie policy page.
Strictly necessary cookies(always on):
Necessary for enabling core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. This cannot be turned off. e.g. Sign in, Language
Analytics cookies:
Analytical cookies help us to analyse user behaviour, mainly to see if the users are able to find and act on things that they are looking for. They allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. Tools used: Google Analytics
The Flood Hydrology Roadmap identified that improving our understanding of uncertainty in hydrological analysis is a key issue that needs to be addressed to support advances in flood hydrology.
In flood risk management, hydrological data and analysis typically takes place within a “chain” of models and analytical processes. Hydrology is often the biggest source of uncertainty in flood modelling, as illustrated in some of our case studies in our M6 project, but frequently gets overlooked with more attention paid to other parts of the modelling chain including the hydraulic model.
Understanding the uncertainty in hydrometric data and identifying where in the modelling chain it occurs is extremely important. It has a direct influence upon real world flooding issues ranging from flood defence design and cost benefit analysis to mapping, real time forecasting, flood warning and resilience to climate change. Crucially, uncertainty may make a difference to the decision that is made by a flood management authority.
This project will engage with data users, review best and emerging practice, and highlight knowledge gaps to identify how improvements can be made.
Our project will:
Provide foundation evidence to support change to current practice that will result in a more informed and appropriate use of hydrometric data and lead to better decision-making.
Identify how improvements can be made to our data collection, archiving and data sharing across the EA and wider hydrological community.
Identify the gaps that exist between best practice and current ways of working.
Ultimately, support improvements to scientific methods in hydrology and provide a higher quality data resource, which underpins all our regulatory, statutory and operational duties.
How our project is improving flood hydrology
Being an exemplar of best practice and contributing to our reputation as trusted custodians of national hydrometric data
Improving the foundational data that flood hydrology science is built upon.
Better informing users how data limitations and uncertainties can be better incorporated into decision asking processes.
How our project is contributing to the UK Flood Hydrology Roadmap
The UK Flood Hydrology Roadmap will be realised through 31 actions grouped into 4 thematic work areas of ways of working, data, methods and scientific understanding. Eight actions have been identified to improve methods in UK flood hydrology related to improving flood hydrology methods, models and systems. Six actions have been identified to improve data in U.K. flood hydrology related to improving long term data quality, quantity and accessibility.
This project will contribute to the methods and data strand actions:
M5 - Review the management of uncertainty in flood hydrology - assess how uncertainty is managed in flood hydrology to help answer the following key questions identified in the Roadmap:
Why is uncertainty management important?
Who is uncertainty management important for?
What are the sources of uncertainty in flood hydrology?
Which types of uncertainty are important?
What are the greatest sources of uncertainty in modelling for flood risk management?
What is the relative importance of different assumptions/data sets that contribute to uncertainty?
How much is the assumption of data stationarity important compared to other assumptions involved in estimating design floods?
D6 - Long term investment in data - ensuring that long-term hydrometric resources are sustainably funded.
Project overview
The Flood Hydrology Roadmap identified that improving our understanding of uncertainty in hydrological analysis is a key issue that needs to be addressed to support advances in flood hydrology.
In flood risk management, hydrological data and analysis typically takes place within a “chain” of models and analytical processes. Hydrology is often the biggest source of uncertainty in flood modelling, as illustrated in some of our case studies in our M6 project, but frequently gets overlooked with more attention paid to other parts of the modelling chain including the hydraulic model.
Understanding the uncertainty in hydrometric data and identifying where in the modelling chain it occurs is extremely important. It has a direct influence upon real world flooding issues ranging from flood defence design and cost benefit analysis to mapping, real time forecasting, flood warning and resilience to climate change. Crucially, uncertainty may make a difference to the decision that is made by a flood management authority.
This project will engage with data users, review best and emerging practice, and highlight knowledge gaps to identify how improvements can be made.
Our project will:
Provide foundation evidence to support change to current practice that will result in a more informed and appropriate use of hydrometric data and lead to better decision-making.
Identify how improvements can be made to our data collection, archiving and data sharing across the EA and wider hydrological community.
Identify the gaps that exist between best practice and current ways of working.
Ultimately, support improvements to scientific methods in hydrology and provide a higher quality data resource, which underpins all our regulatory, statutory and operational duties.
How our project is improving flood hydrology
Being an exemplar of best practice and contributing to our reputation as trusted custodians of national hydrometric data
Improving the foundational data that flood hydrology science is built upon.
Better informing users how data limitations and uncertainties can be better incorporated into decision asking processes.
How our project is contributing to the UK Flood Hydrology Roadmap
The UK Flood Hydrology Roadmap will be realised through 31 actions grouped into 4 thematic work areas of ways of working, data, methods and scientific understanding. Eight actions have been identified to improve methods in UK flood hydrology related to improving flood hydrology methods, models and systems. Six actions have been identified to improve data in U.K. flood hydrology related to improving long term data quality, quantity and accessibility.
This project will contribute to the methods and data strand actions:
M5 - Review the management of uncertainty in flood hydrology - assess how uncertainty is managed in flood hydrology to help answer the following key questions identified in the Roadmap:
Why is uncertainty management important?
Who is uncertainty management important for?
What are the sources of uncertainty in flood hydrology?
Which types of uncertainty are important?
What are the greatest sources of uncertainty in modelling for flood risk management?
What is the relative importance of different assumptions/data sets that contribute to uncertainty?
How much is the assumption of data stationarity important compared to other assumptions involved in estimating design floods?
D6 - Long term investment in data - ensuring that long-term hydrometric resources are sustainably funded.
We really want to deliver the Flood Hydrology Improvements Programme with the hydrological community so if you would like to be involved or to hear more then please get in touch with the team
Thank you for your contribution!
Help us reach out to more people in the community
Share this with family and friends